Identification of regional development drivers by scenario Planning

Document Type: Case Study

Authors

1 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Central Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Urban Planning, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran

3 Department of Reconstruction, Faculty of Urban Planning and Architecture, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Looking ahead is a deeply rooted motivation and even basic human has been faced with this problem, then it cannot be said that noticing future is a feature of modern humans. Merely in the contemporary era due to rise of awareness of human knowledge on one hand and escalating worries about the acceleration of unknown events on the other hand the thought of thinking of future of societies became popular in a more severe frame. The future is something that humans can design with their purposeful measures and then shape it. Increased complexity and precariousness in the few decades has led planners and policy-makers turn to scenario planning making in such circumstances. Adaptability of future methods in urban and regional planning, provides a meticulous approach for regional planning which is mostly based on the interpolation, compatibility and participation. This research was conducted with the goal of regional development and the feasibility of the program in Shemiranat County and through scenario planning in regional planning. Information needed for this research was compiled using an open and structured questionnaire through Delphi method and comments of experts and data from MICMAC in three cycles and then using interactive analysis techniques, they were analyzed in the software. Finally, according to Schwartz scenario writing was conducted. The results show that Shemiranat will face four main scenarios. The four scenarios will be described

Keywords


  • Asan, S. S.; Umut, A.; (2007). Qualitative Cross-Iimpact Analysis with Time Consideration. Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 74: 627-644.
  • Azodi, A.; Shariatpanahi, T.; (2010).  Reviews the Strengths and Weaknesses and the Opportunities and Threats Tourists in the City Shemirani. J. Hum. Geogr., 6: 167 -185.
  • Administration of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism, (2012). Shemiranat Study. Tourism Master Plan Studies. Tehran, Iran.
  • Babaghyby, A. R.; (2010). Future Studies; New Approaches in Comprehensive Transportation Management. Manage. Stud., 16: 21-36.
  • Bill R.; (2012). Directory Approaching Scenario Planning Under Uncertainty. Translated by: M. isolated. Publishing research institution and defense industry, Tehran, Iran.
  • Pilgrims, I.; (2012). The Principles and Methods of Futures Studies. Tehran: Imam Sadiq University Press, Tehran, Iran.
  • Pilgrims, I.; (2011). Evaluation Criteria of Methodological Techniques Strategy. Strategy,77:10-56.
  • Hanafizadeh, P.; Parvin, E.; Salahi, A. A., (2010). Selected Information Systems in Uncertain Environments Using the Hybrid Method (Incorporation of Scenario Planning, Design and Fuzzy Delphi Obviously). Hum. Sci. Res. Manage., 41: 49-7
  • Heidari, A. H.; Kashani, H., (2014). Futurology and Technology Roadmap. Institute for Higher Education Res. Publ. Tehran, Iran.
  • Schwartz, P., (2010). Round-the-Art Foresight, Planning for the Future in a World of Uncertainty. Translated by: A. Alizadeh. Tehran: Publ. of the Center for Futures Studies and Technology of Defense.
  • Myers, D., (2000). Constructing the Future in Planning. J. Plan. Educ. Res., 21: 52-68.
  • Rapper, B., (1999). Rationalizing the Future? Canada: Foresight in Science Press.
  • Chakraborty, A., (2010). Scenario Planning for Effective Regional Governance: Promises and Limitations. State Local Government Rev., 25: 156-167.
  • Godet, M., (2012). Structural analysis with the MICMAC Method Actors’ Strategy with MACTOR Method. USA: AC/UNU Millennium Project.
  • Chermack, T.J., (2011). Scenario Planning in Organizations. USA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Pillkahn, U. L. F., (2008). Using Trends and Scenarios as Tools for Strategy Development. Publicis Kommunikations Agentur GmbH, Erlangen
  • Ratcliffe, J.; Krawczyk, E., (2011). Imagineering city futures: The Use of Prospective through Scenarios in Urban Planning. Futures, 23: 642–653.
  • Schwartz, P., (1991). The Art of the Long View: The Path to Strategic Insight for Yourself and Your Company: Doubleday, England
  • Chakraborty, A., (2010). Scenario Planning for Effective Regional Governance: Promises and Limitations. State Local Government Rev.،, 54: 156-167.
  • Chermach, T., (2001). A Review of Scenario Planning Literature. Futures Res. Q., 36: 110-134.
  • Fahey, L.; Randall, R. M., (1998). Learning from the Future: Competitive Foresight Scenarios. Wiley Publ., New York
  • Jaizuluddin, M., (2011). City Foresight and Development Planning, Case Study: Implementation of Scenario Planning in Formulation of the Bulungan Development Plan. Futures, 7: 43-57.
  • Randt, N. P., (2015). An Approach to Product Development with Scenario Planning: The Case of Aircraft Design. Futures, 11-28.
  • Statistical Center of Iran, (2011). www.amar.org.ir.
  • Godet, A. J.; Meunier, M. F.; Roubelat, F., (2003). Structural Analysis with the MICMAC Method & Actors’ Strategy with MACTOR Method”, in Glenn, J. C.; Gordon, T. J., (Eds), AC/UNU Millennium Project: Futures Research Methodology-V2. Washington DC: AC/UNU Publ.
  • Godet, M., (2006). Creating Futures: Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool. Economica publish, France.
  • Godet, M., (1991). From Anticipation to Action. France: UNESCO Publishing.
  • Godet, M., (2008). Strategic Foresight. France: Lipsor Working Paper Publ.
  • Gordon, T., (1994). Trend Impact Analysis. USA: AC/UNU Millennium Project Publication.
  • Weimer-Jehle, W., (2008). Cross-Impact Balances, Applying Pair Interaction Systems and Multi-Value Kauffman Nets to Multidisciplinary Systems Analysis. Phisica A, 387: 3689-3700.
  • Weimer-Jehle, W., (2008). Scenariowizard Basic2.3. Zim: university of Stuttgart Publ., Germany.