Explanation of Urban Morphology Evaluation methods and Tools in Sustainable Energies Approach

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planing, Sciences and Researches Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The concept of sustainability in the last age has become amplified. Its beginning can be traced far back in the fields of economics and natural resources, relating to the content of natural stocks, the Malthusian concept of resource exhaustion due to population increase. The theory that the spatial form of factors in an urban region influences ecosystem dynamics is based along the estimate that the spatial forms of the urban setting alter the biophysical structure and habitat and act upon the flows of resources. Just recently the relationship between urban patterns and energy efficiency, energy saving or renewable energy local exploitation is getting more and more significant. The much important challenge in this matter always is connected to how we can evaluate different views of the main subjects and can be aware of proper results to have best conclusion. Anyway, for this evaluation new methods need to have adopted by newest technologies that extract accurate data and data. All of new approaches such as, City as a system, Urban metabolism VS Pattern Oriented, integrated PSR-POM approach for urban - energy systems and etc. lead to present newest models and tools like Pixel by pixel analysis, Pixel by pixel analysis, Ranking system, Multivariate statistical analysis, LIDAR system and other tools, nevertheless in this paper the methods will be presented to know how can measure with this standard in urban morphology field in the approach to energy sustainability.

Keywords


Alberti M., (2008) - Advances in Urban Ecology: Integrating Humans and Eco- logical Processes in Urban Ecosystems - ed. Springer, Washington.
Brundtland Commission (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Burtch R (2000). LiDAR principles and applications, IMAGINE Conference, Traverse City, MI Cavalli M., Tarolli P., Marchi L., Dalla Fontana G. 2008 The effectiveness of airborne LiDAR data in the recognition of channel-bed morphology. Catena 73 249–260
Dowling R., Accad A. (2003). Vegetation classification of the riparian zone along the Brisbane River, Queensland, Australia, using light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data and forward looking digital video. Canadian Journal of Remote Sen ing, Vol.29, No. 5, pp. 556-563,
Grimm V. et al (2005) Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology Science 11 November 2005, Vol. 310 no. 5750 pp. 987- 991.
Hollander S (1997). The Economics of Thomas Robert Malthus. University of Toronto Press.
IEA (2008) Greenhouse Gases, Climate Change,

IPCC (2001). Climate Change 2001. The Scientific Basis. Contributions of Working Group 1 to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Jabareen Y. (2006). Sustainable urban forms: Their typologies, models, and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26.
Jiang B, Claramunt C (2002) Integration of space syntax into gis: new perspectives for urban morphology. Trans GIS 6(3):295–309
Lynch K (1961) Good City Form. The MIT press. Cambridge.
Marks K, Bates P. (2000). Integration of high-resolution topographic data with floodplain flow models. Hydrological Processes 14:2109–2122.
Meadows D, Meadows D, Randers J, Behrens W (1972). The Limits to Growth. Universe Books, New York.
Owens S. (1986) Energy, Planning and Urban Form. Pion Ltd. London.
Pearce D., Atkinson G. (1993) “Capital theory and the measurement of sustain- able development: an indicator of ‘weak’ sustainability” Ecological Economics 8 (2), 103–108.
Rachel Oliver (2007). All About: Cities and energy consumption. CNN. http:// edition.cnn.com/2007/TECH/12/31/eco. Cities/index.html (browsed on 2010/01/30)
Rapport D J, Friend A M, (1979). Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Environmental Statistics: A Stress-Response Approach. Statistics Canada 11-510, Ottawa, 87 pp.
Rees W (1997). “Is ‘Sustainable City’ an Oxymoron?” Local Environment, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 303-310.
Sanders L (2001) Models in Spatial Analysis. Hermes Science/Lavoisier, London
Schumann G., Matgen P., Cutler, M.E.J. , Black A., Hoffmann L., Pfister L. (2008). Comparison of remotely sensed water stages from LiDAR, topographic con- tours and SRTM. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 63 283–296
UN (2007). World Population Prospects The 2006 Revision, Executive Summary. United Nations, New York.
UN-Habitat (2009). Climate change strategy 2010-2013. UN-Habitat, Nairobi
Weber J L (2010). “Merging the Ecosystem Approach with the Conventional PSR/DPSIR Framework” (draft for discussion). Expert Group Meeting on the Revision of the Framework for the Development of Environment Statistics (FDES) New York, 8-10 November 2010. Department of Economic and Social affairs, Statistics di- vision, United Nations.
Wheeler S. , Beatley T., (2004). Sustainable Urban Development Reader, Routledge, London.
Zegras P C (2005). Sustainable Urban Mobility: Exploring the Role of the Built Environment. Phd Thesis in Urban and Regional Planning. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.